Supreme Court Hears 1996 Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal Dispute Case

Overview of the Case

In a pivotal session, the Supreme Court has taken on the 1996 lawsuit filed by Haryana against Punjab, revolving around the contentious Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal dispute. This case has significant implications for water distribution between the two states and has been a longstanding issue in the region.

Representation in Court

During the hearing, Haryana was represented by Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, who articulated the state’s position on the disputes regarding water sharing and infrastructure development. Meanwhile, Advocate Gurminder Singh represented Punjab, providing the state’s perspective and legal arguments concerning the canal’s water allocation.

Call for Cooperation

The Supreme Court’s order emphasized the necessity for both Haryana and Punjab to cooperate with the Union Government in achieving an amicable solution to this prolonged dispute. By urging collaboration, the court aims to foster a resolution that benefits both states while addressing the critical geopolitical aspect of water rights and resource management.

As the case continues to unfold, the focus remains on finding a diplomatic resolution that recognizes the needs and rights of both parties while ensuring sustainable management of critical water resources. The outcome could serve as a precedent for similar disputes in the future.